»» FarShores News

Posted Oct 31.01

Cosmic Conspiracies Gets Uppity

The comments below were posted on the FarShores Message Board, and are doubtless in response to my comments: English UFO Group Indulges In Yet More Shameless Self-Promotion.

My own response to this follow:-

Dear Group,
I would like to set the record straight concerning the accusations fielded by Farshores about a story that my site Cosmic Conspiracies is running concerning a US Military Project that is using 3d Morphing materials similar to those reported from the Roswell crash ( http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk).

Gerry from Farshores has posted a letter attacking myself and my co-authors for my site about releasing such information.

First of all I would like to inform you that the agenda that Gerry from Farshores has is nothing to do with the new material that we are about to release whatsoever. To put you all in the picture, Gerry wrote to me late last year in regards to an article that appeared on our site that was forwarded to us by a 3rd party via Email. We did not know at the time that this was Farshores material until Gerry`s letter telling us that it had come from this site. As soon as we did, I added an acknowledgement to Farshores and added a link as he requested. My site got a new update recently and it was during this update that I realised that the Farshores link no longer worked. I did a search on the MSN search engine to see if I could find their new URL, but could not track them down. Therefore I decided to take off the link, and leave the acknowledgement. This week, Gerry contacted me again to say that I hadn`t credited him for the story and that we had another story alledgedly written by him on the site. He wanted me to take the story down. This is fair enough, but to go to the lengths he has to debunk the major story we are releasing is very underhand!

Now onto his accusations. The details released by NASA in April do not relate to the main information that we have uncovered, and there is no way that Gerry could or does know what we are about to release - unless he`s psychic of course!

I`m afraid its the same old story of individuals spouting off before they`ve even viewed the evidence.

NASA has not held a press release to announce the following!

Has NASA released any information about the Exoskeleton suits that we will be detailing...NO

Has NASA told you of experiments on the Shuttle with this new 3d morphing metal...NO!

Has NASA released information about brain chips that allows the user to be able to influence the machinery around him...NO!

Has NASA told you about morphing mechanisms that will allow soldiers to aim guns more accurately at the enemy...NO!

I could go on, but I think you get the gist of where I`m coming from.

If NASA has carried out years of bona-fide experiments into this new technology, why did Anna McGowan, program manager for the Morphing Project at NASA`s Langley Research Center say:

"What we did at NASA-Langley was basically dissect that material to answer the question, `how does it do that?`" McGowan said. "By doing so, we can actually get down to computational modeling of these materials at the molecular level. Once we understand the material`s behavior at that level, then we can create designer `smart` materials,"

Now why would NASA be taking apart materials to see how they worked if they already built it from scratch?

This project will not take 20 years to complete either, as claimed by Gerry, the project has a 3 year timescale and around 75% of it is complete already.

The Roswell connection is also not wishful thinking. One of the main contractors involved in the project is none other than Wright Patterson Airbase, the very place where it was alledged that Roswell crash debris was taken.

So there we have it, another denbunker who speaks before seeing the evidence. What was it that Stanton Friedman said? `Don`t bother me with the facts, my minds made up!`.

Its a pity that Farshores hasn`t got better things to do rather than slag off fellow researchers. And I`m just about sick and tired off all these so-called researchers attacking people who are trying to release important information.

Yours Sincerely,

Dave at Cosmic Conspiracies

FarShores Response:

I`ll keep it brief, folks. My `accusations` were posted on the FarShores website only. It was not I who picked the story up and circulated it via other lists but I don`t have a problem with that.

I see nothing in this Cosmic Conspiracies material that in any way represents new, previously secret, information. It`s out there on the web and by their own admission, searching using suitable `keywords` is all that`s necessary to obtain it. They do not, and never could, have priviledged access to U.S. government files and other information that are denied the rest of us. I won't labor this last point as common sense speaks for itself.

Yes, last year I discovered some of my work was being reproduced on this English website and was being promoted at the time via 'teaser messages' circulated widely across numerous lists, with special emphasis on the 'secret' aspect - something that Cosmic Conspiracies has gained a reputation for.

I registered a protest but in the spirit of co-operation I settled for an acknowledgement,after being informed that no-one there knew it was my work. The compilation of UK Secret/Military Bases is an ongoing listing thanks to the many FarShores visitors, often with personal inside knowledge.

A few days ago, alerted to the latest Cosmic Conspiracies trumpet blast, 'Major UFO Story about to Break!', and the even more emphasized, 'ROSWELL MATERIAL USED IN US MILITARY PROJECT!!!', I once more visited their website. Again, I reiterate that there is nothing new to be found in this latest expose. However, I did discover yet another work written by myself that appears in condensed form and is accompanied by a Copyright notice assigned to Dave Cosnette of Cosmic Conspiracies, no less.

I registered my annoyance and received the weak excuse from him that he thought it was written by one of his pals. How he arrived at this conclusion I have no idea. I was not prepared to permit the group to continue using it under `their` name in the circumstances. There is a pattern here, for those that can see.

I am certainly not a debunker and do not intend to engage in the immature namecalling adopted by Cosnette is his affair. I have no time for headline grabbers -- they come and go given enough rope.

The ones we should all listen to are the longterm researchers who quietly go about their task in genuinely seeking to find a solution for the UFO/Alien puzzle. Not the characters whose agenda seems to hinge on the amount of visitors they receive on their website.

Gerry
FarShores


All Copyrights© are acknowledged.
Material reproduced here is for
educational and research purposes only.

 

  • News
    • Homepage/Index
    • UFOs+ET
    • Ghosts+Hauntings
    • CryptoCorner
    • Ancient Mysteries
    • World Mysteries
    • Space Mysteries
    • Secrets+Conspiracies
    • Links
    • Site Search
    • Message Board
    • E-mail

    News Archive
    • AUGUST 2001
    • JULY 2001
    • JUNE
    • MAY
    • APRIL
    • JAN-MAR
    • AUG-DEC 2000
    • APR - JUL 2000
    • AUG 99 - MAR 2000
    • DEC 98 - JUL 99
    • 1997 - NOV 98

    24/7 Worldwide Anomaly Reporting